Hi and 'gudn tach'!
On Tue, June 29, 2010 12:37, Marcus Buck wrote:
Andre Koopal hett schreven:
The solution we mostly take is to answer in dutch or swedish or
something :-)
Wow, how mature... Hoe durven ze geen Engels te spreken?
If River Tarnell does not speak German and recommends using English if
people want to get a quick answer from him without one of River's
co-admins being interpreter, that's of course okay. But intentionally
being unhelpful to people who in good faith use their native language
(which in the case of German will be understood on this list) is just
offensive and arrogant.
On the other hand you could call someone offensive or arrogant (or at
least not-thinking-enough), if he uses his small native language in an
international project.
Interesting that you call it an 'international' project. That is
technically true, but Wikimedia does not involve 'nations' or
'countries' but rather 'language communities'. So the more appropiate
adjective would be 'multilingual'. And if you replace 'international
project' with 'multilingual project' in your sentence it doesn't sound
that meaningful anymore, does it?
If someone replies in Swedish on a German request, one could
take it as nothing but a joke and a hint 'try using the common language,
please!', which mostly will be English, nowadays.
This "common language" is spoken by less than a quarter of the world
population. If we only count decent English it's more like 10%.