... and, why waste, what, $800 bucks on the base license, plus more on extra
memory due to its bloat, plus even more due to terminal licensing 'n' number
of users, when we can shell out the same amount of cash to get yet another
toolserver? I mean, I'd rather two for the price of one than one for the
price of two, wouldn't you guys?
--
Cheers,
Kurt / "Slakr" @ en.wp
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 15:18, Adam Dodek Michalik wrote:
2008/2/6, Purodha
<toolserver-l.wikipedia.org(a)publi.purodha.net>et>:
I do not have or plan anything that would be
useful to have
one of the Windows O/Ses for.
If someone else has - why not, if such a server could be made secure.
Personally, I don't think there are things which can be done only
using Windows system. What's more, in my opinion remote use of Windows
isn't even half as convenient as Unix shell. I believe the idea of
running Windows toolserver is completely pointless.