Toby wrote:
But anyway, I doubt that DPOV
will ever be written up. Jimmy invented
NPOV, and he says that NPOV includes
what mav wants.
If anything happens, it's that [[NPOV]]
will have to be clarified. But since Jimmy
also keeps agreeing with my
intepretations of it, I see no risk that
any such clarification will threaten your
book. The only alternative is that Jimmy's
opinions are incoherent, but nobody is
arguing that.
Yep - all I ever really wanted was to clarify NPOV to suit the needs of
textbooks (to give it a new framework or focus to work in - I mistakingly
called that "POV"). I was just trying to be clear by giving it a new name but
Jimbo has convinced me that the needed changes are not drastic enough to
warrent a new name. It will just be the "textbook's version of NPOV."
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)