Hiya
Could someone points out to me which are currently the english wikibooks in a well developped state (developped text or comprehensive text) ?
I need this to show good examples to some possible partners of what we can do.
Thanks
Anthere
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 09:35:14 +0100, Anthere anthere9@yahoo.com wrote:
Could someone points out to me which are currently the english wikibooks in a well developped state (developped text or comprehensive text) ?
I need this to show good examples to some possible partners of what we can do.
We have the following books, with disadvantages: Lucid Dreaming (which is mostly done by one contributor (me) and not a "usual"/"orthodox" textbook) High School Extensions (for Maths) which is very good in the sections it does have completed Physics Study Guide (which offers more notes than full explanations, as a study guide) US History, which covers in detail 1492-1969 and aims to continue right to today Cookbook (also not a "proper" textbook) How To Build A Computer, covering the component selection well (which is not very well formatted at the moment) Intelligence Intensification (which, while somewhat wierd, is good in the areas it covers) GCSE Science (in the small area it has already covered only)
And probably more.
thanks. Mostly science then.
About the wikijunior, it seems to me the solar system one is quite advanced as well...
Tomer Chachamu a écrit:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 09:35:14 +0100, Anthere anthere9@yahoo.com wrote:
Could someone points out to me which are currently the english wikibooks in a well developped state (developped text or comprehensive text) ?
I need this to show good examples to some possible partners of what we can do.
We have the following books, with disadvantages: Lucid Dreaming (which is mostly done by one contributor (me) and not a "usual"/"orthodox" textbook) High School Extensions (for Maths) which is very good in the sections it does have completed Physics Study Guide (which offers more notes than full explanations, as a study guide) US History, which covers in detail 1492-1969 and aims to continue right to today Cookbook (also not a "proper" textbook) How To Build A Computer, covering the component selection well (which is not very well formatted at the moment) Intelligence Intensification (which, while somewhat wierd, is good in the areas it covers) GCSE Science (in the small area it has already covered only)
And probably more.
I myself have a scientific bias. Consider going to http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:Book_of_the_month/March_2005_voting and http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:Book_of_the_month/February_2005_votin... and checking all the book liste there. :)
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 06:48:32 +0100, Anthere anthere9@yahoo.com wrote:
thanks. Mostly science then.
About the wikijunior, it seems to me the solar system one is quite advanced as well...
Nod, exactly the sort of thing I was looking for. Thanks :-)
Tomer Chachamu a écrit:
I myself have a scientific bias. Consider going to http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:Book_of_the_month/March_2005_voting and http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:Book_of_the_month/February_2005_votin... and checking all the book liste there. :)
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 06:48:32 +0100, Anthere anthere9@yahoo.com wrote:
thanks. Mostly science then.
About the wikijunior, it seems to me the solar system one is quite advanced as well...
textbook-l@lists.wikimedia.org