thanks. Mostly science then.
About the wikijunior, it seems to me the solar system one is quite
advanced as well...
Tomer Chachamu a écrit:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 09:35:14 +0100, Anthere
<anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Could someone points out to me which are currently
the english wikibooks
in a well developped state (developped text or comprehensive text) ?
I need this to show good examples to some possible partners of what we
can do.
We have the following books, with disadvantages:
Lucid Dreaming (which is mostly done by one contributor (me) and not a
"usual"/"orthodox" textbook)
High School Extensions (for Maths) which is very good in the sections
it does have completed
Physics Study Guide (which offers more notes than full explanations,
as a study guide)
US History, which covers in detail 1492-1969 and aims to continue right to today
Cookbook (also not a "proper" textbook)
How To Build A Computer, covering the component selection well (which
is not very well formatted at the moment)
Intelligence Intensification (which, while somewhat wierd, is good in
the areas it covers)
GCSE Science (in the small area it has already covered only)
And probably more.