Hello Erik, this looks like a great idea. I would need to look more into
literateprograms to see what kinds of materials they have, but alot of what
I have seen already seems like it would be a great fit at wikibooks. I am
not sure whether it would work well at wikisource, but i'm no expert on that
project.
Much of this information could possibly qualify as an "annotated text", with
the code being the "text" and the rest being the annotations. Otherwise, we
have dozens and dozens of books on computer programming languages, and even
some general books on algorithms, and this material might do well being
merged into those locations.
If these people wanted to have their own books, that would be fine too, an
algorithms's book with heavy use of example source code would be
significantly different enough from our current books to warrant a new book
(or even a set of new books, depending on partitioning).
--Andrew Whitworth (Whiteknight)
From: "Erik Moeller"
<erik(a)wikimedia.org>
Reply-To: Wikimedia textbook discussion <textbook-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
To: "discussion list for Wikisource,the free library"
<wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>rg>, "Wikimedia textbook discussion"
<textbook-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: [Textbook-l] Fwd: Proposal:
LiteratePrograms.org as
WikimediaProject
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 05:08:22 +0200
I wonder what the folks on Wikisource and Wikibooks think about this
proposition .. I haven't received any feedback on it on foundation-l.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Moeller <erik(a)wikimedia.org>
Date: Apr 27, 2007 3:13 PM
Subject: Proposal:
LiteratePrograms.org as Wikimedia Project
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
I would like to propose (as a community member) that
http://en.literateprograms.org/
be merged into the Wikimedia Foundation family of projects. I have
spoken with the founder of LiteratePrograms, Derrick Coetzee, and he
would agree to such a merger.
LP documents computer program source code with in-line explanations
beyond simple source comments. Using a special extension, all code
belonging to an example program can be downloaded as a package with
ease. It is, in my opinion, ideally positioned to become a wonderful
learning resource for budding programmers in any programming language.
The structure of LP is fundamentally different from any existing
Wikimedia project. Yet, it is an educational project with great value.
LP currently uses the MIT/X11 license, which is similar to CC-BY, but
more suitable for source code; I believe this makes sense as these
snippets are typically so small that they should not be encumbered
further with copyleft.
WMF would be able to give the project sustainable hosting and exposure
to a vast community. What do you think? If there is no consensus, I'd
be willing to organize a community poll as we did for other projects,
but I really see very little that speaks against LP becoming part of
the WMF project family.
--
Peace & Love,
Erik
DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of
the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.
"An old, rigid civilization is reluctantly dying. Something new, open,
free and exciting is waking up." -- Ming the Mechanic
--
Peace & Love,
Erik
DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of
the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.
"An old, rigid civilization is reluctantly dying. Something new, open,
free and exciting is waking up." -- Ming the Mechanic
_______________________________________________
Textbook-l mailing list
Textbook-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l
_________________________________________________________________
Dont quit your job Take Classes Online and Earn your Degree in 1 year.
Start Today!