Kathy Harris wrote:
OK. That pretty much answered my question.
Now if they cold only explain why the cool new logo with Wikimedia
colors
was not allowed .... ;)
-Kathy
Since we are in branding discussion...
I am not sure who is "they", but I can give it a try
It was perceived that we should give a real identity to each project
logo, not make the logo a derivative either of Wikipedia, or of
Wikimedia Foundation. If I remember well, the logo suggested used WMF
colors. And we asked that this be avoided.
I presume this is the right
page:http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikibooks/Logo
See at the bottom of the page.
Ant
Anthere, so long as it seems we have your attention, I was wondering what
exactly was the status of the new logo? I'm pretty convinced that a shiny
new logo would be a great way to kickstart wikibooks' image. I know all
wikibookians won't agree with me on that point, however.
Who has the final say in the logo? can each wikibooks project select a logo
individually, or do all wikibooks projects have to have the same logo? What
I mean to ask is, can the en.wikibooks community vote on the issue
themselves, or do we have to have a "global" discussion on meta only?
I would like to get the discussion going again on logo discussion, because i
feel like it's really been put on the back burner.
--Andrew Whitworth
_________________________________________________________________
PC Magazines 2007 editors choice for best Web mailaward-winning Windows
Live Hotmail.
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_mig…