Hi everyone, 

I have emailed Juliet and Katherine out the stance of our accounts in the current debate on the Freedom of Panorama. 

Personally, I like the medium piece: https://medium.com/@owenblacker/freedom-of-panorama-is-under-attack-6cc5353b4f65

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote:
+1, but I'd like to hear Katherine's thoughts first.

--Ed

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Tilman Bayer <tbayer@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi Joe,

agree with you on both aspects - on the one hand it's more political
and opinionated (i.e. non-NPOV) that what @wikipedia would normally
feature, but on the other hand there has IMHO rarely been a political
issue with more directly impact on the work of Wikimedians.

I would suggest to simply retweet the Times, from @wikipedia,
@wikimedia and @wikicommons:

https://twitter.com/thetimes/status/613693063320485888

For more context, see
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_Panorama_2015 ,
which includes some Twitter ideas already and the hashtags currently
in use, in particular https://twitter.com/hashtag/saveFoP?src=hash .
Some (not all) of these would also be suitable for RTs.

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Joe Sutherland
<jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> This might be good to get social out for, since it would directly affect us.
>
> I'm not sure if it's the kind of thing we normally post since it's quite political, so would be good to hear opinions!
>
> Joe
>
>


--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media



--
Ed Erhart
Editorial Intern
Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media




--
Michael Guss
Research Analyst
Wikimediafoundation.org
mguss@wikimedia.org