I know that the first article on Ar Wiki was "water" which was created on July 11, 2003 and this is the date on which the community celebrates Ar wiki anniversary every year. I asked about that edit on 2001 earlier and found that it's an error in timestamp as  Guillaume has mentioned. I believe that the automatic way is not the best way to get accurate dates. It would be better if we create a page on meta and ask community on different wikis to contribute to it. Maybe we can ask them on Wikimedia-l?

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Thanks for this Guillaume! It's not as easy as one would imagine...

Joe

On 6 July 2015 at 21:30, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote:
You might be interested in talking with Graham87, who's done a lot of work with importing old edits from nostalgia.wiki.

--Ed

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Guillaume Paumier <gpaumier@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Le lundi 6 juillet 2015, 15:50:21 Joe Sutherland a écrit :
> It's kind of odd that there's no list anywhere already; I can't be the
> first person to ask this! But that would be much appreciated Guillaume :)

So, I've got a preliminary list, but it looks like we might need to find a
better way of identifying the creation date than the earliest timestamp,
because it gives some weird results:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P895

Here's an excerpt from the top of the list:

19700101000000: zhwikisource
20010115000000: arwiki
20010116200833: enwiki
20010116200833: nostalgiawiki
20010223175216: enwikibooks
20010308131402: elwiki
20010317014148: cawiki
20010402182741: dewiki

BUT:
* zhwikisource wasn't created in 1970 (or we've been lied to for a long time).
* arwiki wasn't created before enwiki, and enwikibooks and elwiki weren't
created before cawiki.
* nostalgia wiki has exactly the same earliest timestamp as enwiki?
Suspicious.
* Some wikis don't return an earliest timestamp at all (?!), see bottom of the
list.

So there definitely are oddities; they're probably due to errors with
timestamps, or servers losing time, etc. (see
https://www.facebook.com/gpaumier/posts/10154157729588475 for a similar issue
I recently discovered, and that Tim helped resolve). Therefore, revision
timestamps are probably not a reliable way to determine the creation date of a
wiki.

As a wikiarchaeologist, I do find this kind of stuff incredibly interesting,
though, so I'll look into it further during my Copious Free Time™, but likely
after Wikimania. (I like the fact that I seem to have inadvertently discovered
a way to identify all edits across wikis with an aberrant timestamp!)

--
Guillaume Paumier

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media



--
Ed Erhart
Editorial Intern
Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media




--
Joe Sutherland
Communications Intern [remote]
m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media




--
Samir Elsharbaty,
Communications Intern, Wikipedia Education Program
Wikimedia Foundation
+2.011.200.696.77
selsharbaty@wikimedia.org
education.wikimedia.org