Fine by me—I'd just rather come up with something slightly more appealing that "hey, here's a data release." :-)--EdOn Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:https://twitter.com/WikiResearch/status/647481174307115009On Sep 25, 2015, at 11:30 AM, Michael Guss <mguss@wikimedia.org> wrote:Yeah, I don't know if we want to say "help us understand" in the social media post.I prefer we lead with: "Today, we are releasing a new dataset (documentation) to invite community members and researchers to join us in analyzing this trend" for Fb/GOn Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:Looks good, though I'm not sure where the "help us understand" bit comes in. Is that just to qualify that we don't have a cause?On 25 September 2015 at 18:48, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote:_______________________________________________Facebook/Google+/Twitter:Proposed social media messages:Hi all,We just published "Wikipedia’s very active editor numbers have stabilized—delve into the data with us" to the blog. Thanks to Aaron, Neil, and Dario for their help with the post!
- The English Wikipedia's number of very active editors appears to have stabilized. Help us understand why.
--Ed Erhart
Editorial Associate
Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
--Joe Sutherland
Communications Intern [remote]m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
--Dario Taraborelli Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
--Ed Erhart
Editorial Associate
Wikimedia Foundation