"Check this out first" sounds friendlier but is longer, so "Read this" as James suggested might be best. Otherwise I agree that Ed's FB posts are good and Joe's tweets are good.

My meme with Jimmy's quote raised the most questions on FB (although they are addressed well in the article already for those that then actually read it). So fair warning on that. ;)

I think that this article is both great to be putting out and important to spread far and wide. I would encourage affiliates to retweet and repost this as well.

-greg

_______________
Sent from my iPhone - a more detailed response may be sent later.

On Sep 19, 2015, at 12:08 AM, James Alexander <jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Yeah, I'd be concerned (at least with this post) about making a very clear "Don't" (as much as I, personally, would agree with the statement :) ).

I like Ed's FB/G+ copy (especially the 2nd/Jimmy quote). I'd go with Joe's copy for Twitter, like both 1 & 2, I'd probably drop "first" (I'd just go with "Read this", feel like it sounds more like a command) but aren't fussed either way :).

James Alexander
Manager
Trust & Safety
Wikimedia Foundation
(415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
The issue is that I don't think the message is "don't", the message is more like "only if you understand the community views on it". That makes a bit trickier to get something engaging but which is also true to the message of the post ;)

Joe

On 19 September 2015 at 04:30, Michael Guss <mguss@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi Joe,

Yeah let's get people to read this :) 

I like the second option. 

Maybe even say something like "Thinking of paying for a Wikipedia article? Don't." 


On Friday, September 18, 2015, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey,

I'm not convinced that Twitter copy is ideal :) How is:

• Should you pay for a Wikipedia article? [link]
• Thinking of paying for a Wikipedia article? Read this first. [link]

Both are still perhaps a little risqué but not as misleading. Let me know what you think and we can get this scheduled for Monday morning.

Joe

On 18 September 2015 at 22:45, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi all,

"Should I pay for a Wikipedia article?" is prepped and scheduled to go out at 7:30am PST tomorrow, assuming the blog's time zone is PST. A preview for those with WordPress access is available, or there is a draft Google Doc. The image comes from Commons.

Thanks go to Gamaliel for the post.

Proposed social media messages follow:

Twitter:
  • Considering paying for a Wikipedia article? Check out a reference guide first:
Facebook/Google+:
  • Wikipedia's rules on editing for money are numerous. Here's a summary:
  • As Jimmy Wales says, "If anybody emails you asking for money pretending to be Wikipedia, alarm bells should ring ... Everything about Wikipedia is free."

As always, I'm open to suggestions and improvements, and I'm fairly certain that someone here can come up with better posts!

--
Ed Erhart
Editorial Associate
Wikimedia Foundation



--
Joe Sutherland
Communications Intern [remote]


--
Michael Guss
Research Analyst




--
Joe Sutherland
Communications Intern [remote]

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media