that WFM, the other draft in my head was essentially that.

Yeah, I like the idea of doing a couple of them, For Twitter my other favorites are #1 and #2. For F/G I'm generally happy with them all (but like sneaking in the 1 person 1 article bit)

James Alexander
Community Advocacy
Wikimedia Foundation
(415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I proposed a good deal of these because I'd like to start socializing our articles more than once each (as discussed in our Monday meeting)—more so for the picks and news, but at least twice here.

On the Twitter suggestion, how about this? 80 hours finding sources, who knows how long reading them, and 300 hours writing: one person, one article. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/30/improving-wikipedia-texas-revolution/

--Ed

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:14 PM, James Alexander <jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:


James Alexander
Community Advocacy
Wikimedia Foundation

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:



Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):

• This #Wikipedia editor devoted hundreds of hours to one article.
• Two women are taking the lead on improving #Wikipedia's articles on the #Texas Revolution. Here's one of them.
• Ever wonder why #Wikipedia's articles on the #Texas Revolution are so good?
• 80 hours identifying sources, who knows how long reading them, and 300 hours of writing. And that's just one person.


I love the last one but would love to incorporate the  1 article piece too I think that resonates. How about:

Facebook/Google+:

• This #Wikipedia editor devoted hundreds of hours to one article.
• Ever wonder why #Wikipedia's articles on the #Texas Revolution are so good? 80 hours identifying sources, an untold number of hours reading them, and 300 hours of writing. That's just one of the people who worked on it.
• 80 hours identifying sources, an untold number of hours reading them, and 300 hours of writing. And that's just one of the people who worked on it.

thanks,
Joe

I'm thinking #2 

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media




--
Ed Erhart
Editorial Intern
Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media