Heh, fair point there was a lot of context missing there ;)For the record I'm all in favor, and I was doing a cheap joke for the entertainment of those who knew the history :)The worst problems are usually something that we will have on our radar, these articles are not hard to quickly review, and the community IS actually very good at reviewing these. When there are DYKs we're not interested in sharing there is no issue skipping them, there are 24 a day :) it's not like we're going to run out.On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:Okay, fair point. In fairness I think something like that's unlikely to happen in the future :P(For context for those unaware, he's talking about this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibraltarpedia ... think this may have been pre-Katherine :) )On 6 August 2015 at 18:26, James Alexander <jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:_______________________________________________On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:It's gotten a lot better in fairness. Checking the article isn't awful before we publish it on social is also pretty trivial, thankfully.JoeYes.... Yes it has....BUT DYK that Gibraltar was ceded to Britain "in perpetuity" under the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713?/Ducks/James AlexanderCommunity AdvocacyWikimedia Foundation(415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
--Joe Sutherland
Communications Intern [remote]m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media