I agree with Chris’s recommendation below to just say ‘MediaWiki’ (instead of "the current version of MediaWiki”).

Much appreciated,

Fabrice

On Apr 20, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Chris Steipp <csteipp@wikimedia.org> wrote:

On Apr 20, 2015 4:13 PM, "Andrew Sherman" <asherman@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> We just published "Improving the security of our users on Wikimedia sites" to the blog. URL:
>
> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/04/20/improving-security-for-our-users/
>
> Thanks to Chris for writing and helping us edit this post.
>
> Below are some proposed social media messages. Tweak as needed.
>
> Twitter
>
> We teamed up with @iSECPartners and @OpenTechFund to assess the security of our sites. Check out the report here [link]
>
> FB/G+
>
> We teamed up with iSEC Partners to assess the security of our sites and protect the privacy of our users. Their engineers developed attacks against the current version of MediaWiki to identify security flaws, in a new report sponsored by the Open Technology Fund. [link]

Maybe just "MediaWiki" instead of "the current version of MediaWiki", since we did a release to specifically fix issues that they found. Might confuse some people as is.

>
> Thanks,
> --
> Andrew Sherman
> Digital Communications | Wikimedia Foundation
>
> E: asherman@wikimedia.org
> WMF: ASherman (WMF)

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media

_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media