oh for an openID provider on SUL........On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote:I'm not advocating for open commenting! That would be a lot of extra work for all of us. Social media is easy, but many community members won't comment because they don't use their real names on-wiki.--EdOn Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:On 6 July 2015 at 14:00, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote:Are we still planning to resocialize this story? We've still only had the two posts (one each for Twitter/Facebook).I believe that we're tracking likes and shares now, Alex, but it's hard to gauge community participation. The Signpost, for instance, gets plenty of comments because it's on-wiki and everyone has an account there. Perhaps the requirement for a WordPress account is too high a bar?Spam is a real issue with stuff like this, and I think social media allows for easy enough commenting?Joe_______________________________________________--EdOn Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Alex Stinson <astinson@wikimedia.org> wrote:Glad to see the post shared! Love it!It occurs to me as someone who has written several blog posts, and supported several others: I am always dis-appointed a bit on the number of comments on the blog post itself: but it seems that a lot of the commenting/visibility will happen elsewhere. Is there a way to surface both page views on the blog alongside number of likes/retweets, etc. I think it would be great to get a sense of scale for community participation in reading/hearing the stories on the platform itself (and maybe provide a different incentive structure/invitation for participating in the blog, by marking shares/retweets, etc as valid responses to the post).Cheers,Alex StinsonOn Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Michael Guss <mguss@wikimedia.org> wrote:Furthermore, we'll be consistently resharing stories from now on.On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Michael Guss <mguss@wikimedia.org> wrote:Good morning,The following has been shared:On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote:--EdSometime, Michael, you're going to have to miss a beat ... ... but it will not be this day. :-)
Thank you very much!--On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Michael Guss <mguss@wikimedia.org> wrote:Hi Ed,I have already scheduled these for tomorrow morning to meet the most traffic.
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote:--EdJames- agreed. At the least, we need to push out two or more for Twitter—I think it's an underutilized resource.@Michael, can you post some of these tomorrow? Joe will be on a plane over the Atlantic Ocean.
--
Ed Erhart
Editorial Intern
Wikimedia Foundation----
--Ed Erhart
Editorial Intern
Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
--Joe Sutherland
Communications Intern [remote]m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
--Ed Erhart
Editorial Intern
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media