Responses below.-gregOn Aug 13, 2015, at 12:57 AM, James Alexander <jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:Thoughts inlineOn Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Tilman Bayer <tbayer@wikimedia.org> wrote:from @wikipedia and @mediawiki:
https://twitter.com/wikidata/status/631460768249200641
No real issues from mediawiki but this one worries me a bit from @wikipedia. It just sounds a bit too technical/inside baseball. Even I read it and went "arbitrary access? WTF is that?" before thinking harder and realizing they mean being able to call within templates etc. I worry that the vast majority of our audience would have no idea what this is.Agree that it is appropriate for @mw - seems less so for @wp
from @wikipedia:https://twitter.com/WikimediaCH/status/626066626308407296
Fine by me as long as we're ok with calling it Wikipedia's medical encyclopedia (possibly implying it's an official app?).I’m on the fence about these personally - has mobile weighed in on these set of apps?
from @wikicommons and perhaps others:
https://twitter.com/benglabs/status/629966289574957056
https://twitter.com/Pyb75/status/629670299580125185LGTMLGTM from @wc and @wp - maybe @wm
from @mediawiki, the first one perhaps also from @wikipedia:
https://twitter.com/brionv/status/629733830547509248mayyyybe from @wikipedia, fairly technical though. @mediawiki for sure
https://twitter.com/brionv/status/630384030509207552LGTM for @mediawiki+1 for just @mw only
from @wikimedia and perhaps others:
https://twitter.com/danjarratt/status/631139320997392385LGTM for @wikimedia/@wikipedia/@wikicommons+1 for all three_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media