Like them both (and good article!) only quibble for the Twitter one would be perhaps a 'how' at the start? ("How volunteer editors work..." ) not necessary but sounds a bit better in my head.For the facebook one I like the added depth but kinda like the draw from the twitter post? Maybe combine the two? "How volunteer editors work to educate the public on the Zika virus as it spreads throughout the Americas. We spot to two editors who've made around 200 combined edits to the English Wikipedia article on the outbreak." ?On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:_______________________________________________Hey all, here is some proposed social for the newly-published post on the Zika virus:Twitter:• Volunteer editors work to educate the public on the Zika virus as it spreads throughout the Americas. http://blog.wikimedia.org/2016/03/11/volunteers-zika-virus/Facebook:• We spoke to two editors who've made around 200 edits between them to the English Wikipedia's article on the outbreak. http://blog.wikimedia.org/2016/03/11/volunteers-zika-virus/best,Joe
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media