It's honestly fine from a reader's perspective.
The blog URL is in the caption.--
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote:--EdI didn't think this all the way through when I wrote those... it's not going to be clear who "we" are. Maybe "Our blog has ..." ?Best,On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:LGTM!JoeOn 10 June 2015 at 19:17, Andrew Sherman <asherman@wikimedia.org> wrote:_______________________________________________Hello Everyone,We just published "How the Wikimedia Foundation Board elections are organized" to the blog. URL:Thanks to James and Greg for writing the post and helping us edit.Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.Twitter:Have you ever wondered what goes on behind the scenes of a Wikimedia election? We have an exclusive look: <link>Facebook/G+:Have you ever wondered what goes on behind the scenes of a Wikimedia election? We have an exclusive look: <link>Thanks,--Andrew ShermanDigital Communications | Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
--Joe Sutherland
Communications Intern [remote]m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
--Ed Erhart
Editorial Intern
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media