Just thinking on the opening sentence int he blog: "For over fifteen years, the scope of topics that Wikipedia covers has grown steadily." Should it really be _over fifteen_?
*Med vänliga hälsningar,Jan Ainali*
Verksamhetschef, Wikimedia Sverige http://wikimedia.se 0729 - 67 29 48
*Tänk dig en värld där varje människa har fri tillgång till mänsklighetens samlade kunskap. Det är det vi gör.* Bli medlem. http://blimedlem.wikimedia.se
2015-08-17 22:54 GMT+02:00 James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org:
Thanks Joe! I'm glad to see your thesis up! Great piece and if anyone gets a chance to read the full thesis (obviously longer) you should!. Social comments in line.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "How Wikipedia responds to breaking news" to the blog. URL:
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/17/wikipedia-breaking-news/
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • How does Wikipedia respond to breaking news? http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/17/wikipedia-breaking-news/
Looks good overall, happy with this if you'd prefer but perhaps a bit of an answer to tease them (like below)? perhaps:
- How does Wikipedia respond to breaking news? Awfully like a newsroom
it turns out. http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/17/wikipedia-breaking-news/
*Facebook/Google+:* • "Overall, the study shows that Wikipedia works on breaking news much like a traditional newsroom—verifiability is held in high regard, and a 'core group' of editors tend to contribute a vast majority of the content." http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/17/wikipedia-breaking-news/
LGTM
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media