Hello,

For starters I am not sure I feel very comfortable with the precedent
of creating private wikis for administrators as we risk that list
increasing once we open that door.

On the other hand I can see the shortcomings of a mailing list (even a
private one) to coordinate or document LTAs et al. As an
administrator, I understand the need to keep some stuff hidden to
avoid e.g. spoiling some anti-vandalism measures.

If the wiki is to be created I agree with Martin that using the
current schema would be better for consistency, and to avoid typing
'wiki' two times (User:xxx@sysop_itwiki v. User:xxx@sysop_itwikiwiki).

Best regards, M.

El sáb., 4 jul. 2020 a las 22:01, Martin Urbanec
(<martin.urbanec@wikimedia.cz>) escribió:
>
> Hey,
>
> we have several arbcom wikis, which all follow scheme of arbcom-xx.wikipedia.org, where xx is the language code. Daimona recently requested a new wiki for sysops, using the same scheme <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T256545>.
>
> However, @Amir Ladsgroup points out this makes little sense, and sysop-itwiki.wikimedia.org would make more sense.
>
> My opinion is we should stick with our current standard, given it works for any hypothetical arbcom/sysop/whatever for any wiki, we'll just prepend the wiki domain name with a prefix describing the wiki functionality.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Martin
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sitereq-l+unsubscribe@wikimedia.org.

--
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sitereq-l+unsubscribe@wikimedia.org.