On 15 January 2012 01:16, Merlijn van Deen <valhallasw@arctus.nl> wrote:
In some spare time, I hacked together an automated test runner (...)

The results are available at: http://toolserver.org/~pywikipedia/nightly/testing/test_pywikipedia.txt (and in xunit format, if anyone prefers that).

Anyone who checked the output will have noticed there were a lot of tests failing. I fixed this today by removing tests (such as the ones that required user input) or broken code (such as a bit of code from date.py).

In addition, I created a nosetests configuration file, allowing anyone to quickly run tests by typing 'nosetests' in the pwb root directory (you might need to pip install nose first).

As a bonus, we now also have coverage reports - and they are not as bad as I expected! Feel free to browse around http://toolserver.org/~pywikipedia/nightly/testing/coverage/ .

Best,
Merlijn