Feature Requests item #3528259, was opened at 2012-05-19 09:38
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xqt
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=352825…
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: xqt (xqt)
Summary: Do not use preloading in featured.py
Initial Comment:
Using the 'pagegenerators', data transfer is not compressed.
That data will be several megabytes.
That transfer is very time consuming.
Therefore, I think a good idea to remove that line.
Thank you consider.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2012-05-20 07:20
Message:
Maybe the header is wrong. I found 'Accept-encoding' as header parameter
but at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Client_Code header is described
as 'Accept-Encoding' (capital Encoding)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2012-05-20 06:41
Message:
I was confirmed by Wireshark.
This is a packet analysis software.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2012-05-20 06:31
Message:
I don't know whether they are compressed or not. How did you see it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2012-05-20 05:15
Message:
I understand. In the request header are described.
However, the response data are not compressed.
May be a bug of MediaWiki.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2012-05-20 02:04
Message:
This has nothing to do with preloading generator. http requests are done by
Site.PostData() or Site.getUrl() with gzip compression enabled by default.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2012-05-19 10:19
Message:
I also do not consume more time is good.
gzip compression will compress to about one-third of the text data.
Therefore, transfer time will be one-third. Is roughly.
However, data transfer has not been compressed in the generator.
This proposal is one way to solve this problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2012-05-19 09:48
Message:
It is less time consuming than loading e.g. 60 times each page separately.
What is the intention of this request?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=352825…