Strainu <strainu10@gmail.com> writes:
> Regarding the proposed solutions, I am wary of the WMF "taking over"
> the development of pwb (call me old fashion if you like, but I'm still
> not over 2014). Also, more reviewers without a clear direction do not
> help. I used to have +2 a while ago, but I dropped out anyway because
> I couldn't understand where the main developers were taking pwb.

I completely agree with you in the case of larger changes (e.g. architecture changes or feature requests), but I think there could be more reviewers to help with smaller patches, such as trivial or minor bug fixes. Surely one doesn't need a vision or direction to recognize that we should be keeping up with breaking API changes, or to help with the backlog of obsolete patches? (I'd help, but, again, a good patch reviewing guide would be immensely helpful.)