-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 27.12.2012 16:54, info(a)gno.de wrote:
Some remarks from me. Sorry I am not quite familar
vcs as well as svn. I just use these things as long they work for
me. I use tortoiseSVN for the svn repository and I played a bit
with tortoiseGit and mw repository samples. I guess the only thing
I need for git repository is push access via labs. I hope so.
"I just use these things as long they work for me." - to be honest I
feel the same, SVN works for me... ;))
I think for bot operators it is quite similar to
checkout the git
or svn repository or at least use the nightly dump.
I agree with Martin to move closer to mw and not to spread over
different sites. This is also valid for documentation which is
still messy. But bugzilla seems not to be an alternative for sf
yet. So we should not move outside the mw family only und just to
If we could have github as a mirror und the main repository at mw,
why not. But I cannot estimate whether this has any benefits.
Also the rest I can agree with (despite the fact that I do not use
tortoise - come'on; how still wants to use windows?! ;))) especially
since it looks like everybody wants to follow "the hype" and migrate
to git. For me the most important thing would be that finally somebody
is able to build a VCS that is not that bad that everybody has to
replace it after 5 years again...(CVS, SVN, git, <next candidate?>)
(how should it explain this to my children...?! ;))
Greetings and a happy new year to everybody!! Thanks for all you work!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----