Well, they are not mainly a digitizing organization, most of what they do
is taking care of the cultural heritage in the wild. I also believe they
already digitized most of their photos years ago (and if I recall correctly
over 95% of that is under free licenses or PD). What is being digitized now
is new additions (like if someone donates photos) or really old paperwork
(being in the public domain). So I guess that one thing they want to state
with this is that they will not accept donations unless they are put under
a free license. The other thing is about new productions, that they
shouldn't hire photographs that won't accept CC terms or use regular stock
photo sites, or even photos from other agencies that are not as progressive.
Best regards
Jan Ainali
http://ainali.com
Den ons 6 feb. 2019 kl 02:33 skrev L.Gelauff <lgelauff(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi Jan,
I'm a little surprised by this strong statement. Maybe I'm not familiar
enough with the materials they typically digitize/publish (my reference
point is their Dutch sister organization).
I'm all in favor of not spending government (or in this case, agency)
funds on non-free materials, but I can imagine quite a few edge cases where
digitizing photos that are not yet free, may be beneficial (because some
day, they will be - and some materials have the nasty habit of
deteriorating). Or is this kind of scenario simply out of their scope?
Best,
Lodewijk
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:20 PM Jan Ainali <jan(a)aina.li> wrote:
I will as soon as there are any publicly
available links.
Best regards,
Jan Ainali
http://ainali.com
Den fre 1 feb. 2019 kl 18:05 skrev Claudio Ruiz <
claudio(a)creativecommons.org>gt;:
Hi Jan,
Would you mind to share some links regarding the news for additional
information about the program?
Thanks!
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 11:20 AM Jan Ainali <ainali.jan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The Swedish National Heritage Board has had an
internal policy
promoting the use of CC BY, CC0 and PDM since 2017 but today they
communicated internally in a very forceful way. Part of the message (my
translation from Swedish):
"Employees may not in their service use others copyrighted photographs
that cannot be marked with CC BY, CC0 or PDM.
Material that cannot be marked with PDM, CC0 or CC BY shall not be
digitized or published."
While it may not change their output much (they are already among the
best in Sweden) I suspect this will send strong signals in the Swedish GLAM
sector.
Best regards,
Jan Ainali
http://ainali.com
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
--
Claudio Ruiz
Director of Ecosystem Strategy
Creative Commons <https://creativecommons.org>
@claudio
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy