Personally, I'm unfamiliar with any such. Wikipedia's stance, so far as I
know, has always been that judgments are copyright free and that other
documents are subject to the non-free content policy and guideline.
Maggie
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Stephen LaPorte <slaporte(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
Hello all,
Here is a ruling in New York about fair use for legal briefs and other
court filings:
http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2013/02_-_February/Copy…
Does anyone know of any recent on-wiki discussions about fair use analysis
of court documents?
--
Stephen LaPorte
Legal Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
*This message might have confidential or legally privileged information
in it. If you have received this message by accident, please delete it and
let us know about the mistake. For legal reasons, I may only serve as an
attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation. This means I may not give legal
advice to or serve as a lawyer for community members, volunteers, or staff
members in their personal capacity.*
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
--
Maggie Dennis
Community Liaison
WikimediaFoundation.org