Hi,

I actually thought it is not wise to "overdo it" with the copy/pasted responses. I had the chance to chat briefly with Marco Giorello, who is deputy head of unit "Copyright" at DG MARKT and responsible for the consultation. He said that while it is good to see one set of responses is supported by more than one organisation, they are sceptical about mass submissions, as they want to include all viewpoints and not just reflect the most active groups. Still, if they present answers in a quantitative way, it could come in handy to have the most respondents on your side.

About the data: so far the Commission has always released the full data sets. Going through past consultations it is even possible to see how each respondent answered. So the data will be published, we need to put the emphasis on a timely release when we ask for it. That will be crucial.

In case they really go through with another attempt at a "notice and action" Directive, they might actually open a new consultation. But that's just guessing for now. Otherwise we don't need to wait for a call to give our opinion. We can comment and release statements about the copyright reform pretty much every step of the way. If the commission releases an actual white paper we should be prepared to write up a position paper (the more people follow the process actively, the higher our chances). The white paper is expected before summer.

Dimi





2014-03-07 17:35 GMT+01:00 Mathias Schindler <mathias.schindler@wikimedia.de>:
2014-03-07 17:25 GMT+01:00 Luis Villa <lvilla@wikimedia.org>:
> We could obviously have generated many more responses if we had wanted to.
> Any thoughts on when/how we should do that, if ever?
>

DG MARKT has not released any statements on the methodology of the
consulation analysis. According to Kerstin Jorna from the commission,
the methodology will be developed "on the fly" while they are reading
the responses. Most likely, similar/identical statements will be
considered as one statement. Multiplying the number of responses to
the commission will most likely not have a beneficial effect in this
case.

There might be future opportunities with a different calculation. Or
we might come up with a plan of creating many many responses that will
not be considered identical in nature and counted as one.

The next opportunity in my opinion, however, is a different one:
Analysis of the consultation raw data. Several people have urged DG
MARKT to release the raw data as soon as possible. If this happens
soon and if we manage to conduct analysis of the responses before the
commission, we can shape the perception of this consultation. This
would be a work item with high effort and potential high reward.

Mathias

_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors