Friendly reminder ... I'm assuming that nobody intends to use any WMF resources; if so, this guideline would apply.   http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal_and_Community_Advocacy/Foundation_Policy_and_Political_Association_Guideline

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Stephen LaPorte <slaporte@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Below is an update on the Filipino editor community's discussions about the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (Republic Act 10175).

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paolo B. <titopao@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Yet Another Cybercrime Law (Philippines)
To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Cc: Wikimedia Phillippines mailing list <wikimedia-ph@lists.wikimedia.org>


Hello Benjamin,

As far as Wikipedia is concerned, some members of the Filipino editors'
community (myself included) are trying to gather a consensus before
requesting for a blackout of the English Wikipedia for the Philippines
(that is, a 24-hour blackout that will only take effect here and not
including other countries). We might probably include other local
Philippine-language Wikipedias as well, but that's still under discussion,
here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:TAMBAY#Proposed_blackout

I have only been able to participate in soliciting the input of other Pinoy
WIkipedians (through messages in their Talk pages) just now, as I was away
from my desktop computers recently. So I'm not sure how many other Filipino
Wikipedians are yet to hear of our proposal. (This proposal, by the way, is
an initiative of the local editing community and is not an official action
of the local chapter, Wikimedia Philippines.)

Outside Wikipedia, however, the rage against the bill is pretty s trong. A
lot of Filipinos have changes their Facebook and Twitter profile pictures
into a solid black square. Even a news website
(http://www.interaksyon.com/) changed
its layout to a black background. There was a protest movement yesterday at
the Supreme Court, in support of the seven (7) petitions asking for a
temporary restraining order (TRO) of Republic Act 10175; however, no TRO
was issued yesterday as a number of judges were absent because of official
duties. Suffice it to say that, yes, there is a significant opposition to
the Cybercrime Law (specifically on the provisions on libel), and for sure
it will be in the news in the days to come....


Paolo Barazon
Trustee, Wikimedia Philippines
(speaking on a personal capacity, not on behalf of Wikimedia Philippines)



On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Benjamin Lees <emufarmers@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/09/philippines-new-cybercrime-prevention-act-troubling-free-expression
> I suppose this is old news by now, but I haven't seen it mentioned here
> yet.  Are any projects taking action?
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l


--
Stephen LaPorte
Legal Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation


_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors




--
Geoff Brigham
General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
149 New Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
+1 (415) 839-6885 ext. 6750
gbrigham@wikimedia.org

California Registered In-House Counsel

This message might have confidential or legally privileged information in it. If you have received this message by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. For legal reasons, I may only serve as an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation. This means I may not give legal advice to or serve as a lawyer for community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.