Send Advocacy_Advisors mailing list submissions to
        advocacy_advisors@lists.wikimedia.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        advocacy_advisors-request@lists.wikimedia.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        advocacy_advisors-owner@lists.wikimedia.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Advocacy_Advisors digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. non-free academic publishing licenses (Luis Villa)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:27:18 -0700
From: Luis Villa <lvilla@wikimedia.org>
To: Advocacy Advisory Group for WMF LCA
        <advocacy_advisors@lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: [Advocacy Advisors] non-free academic publishing licenses
Message-ID:
        <CAM2wSz5503dZREk43hwMLer2udW7BE0C4AMyy8pOxiUDR_hBPw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi, all-

An academic publishing group called STM (The International Association of
Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers) has published some "open"
licenses that, well, aren't really open. In my reading, they fail both the
OKFN's open definition and freedomdefined.org's definition, so would not be
acceptable on Commons or other WMF projects.

Andrés Guadamuz has written about this more here:
http://www.technollama.co.uk/academic-publishers-draft-and-release-their-own-open-access-licences#

I'm considering drafting a WMF blog post on this issue, because of the
potential for confusion and the limitations on reuse[1]. I've also been
made aware of a potential letter on the subject from a variety of related
organizations that we'll consider signing on to.

This is not advocacy per se, since it is a private group and not a
government, but I wanted to give you all a heads up in case you were asked
about it by publishers or other people in the open access movement.

Have a great weekend-
Luis

[1] We have piles of materials from legitimately open-licensed journals,
like PLOS:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Media_from_PLOS_journals
(seriously,
I spent minutes clicking around in there and never got past the letter A,
alphabetically)


--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810

*This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have
received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the
mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical
reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community
members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. For more
on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer>.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/advocacy_advisors/attachments/20140725/914445f8/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors


End of Advocacy_Advisors Digest, Vol 25, Issue 26
*************************************************