On Sunday, August 10, 2014, Amgine &lt;<a href="mailto:amgine@wikimedians.ca">amgine@wikimedians.ca</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">In its simplest form, providers who offer a free lane must incentivize the non-free lane. The first incentive will be full internet access rather than limited content. The second will almost certainly be faster throughput - which really means the free lane will also be the slow lane of tiered internet service.<br>

</blockquote><div><br></div><div>This does not follow, and again services such as DNS are perfect examples. It&#39;s in any ISP&#39;s interest to provide DNS which is both fast and free in order to compete with other ISPs (whether there are a sufficient number of ISPs in various locales to support effective competition is another question, much more worthy of our time, by the way.) The same is true with any zero-rated service. If an ISP offers fast and free WP0, it will have an advantage over competitors relegating it to slow and free.</div>
<div><br></div>To whom to I appeal my moderation on this list?<div><br></div>