Interiors might be hard to achieve because interior FoP tends to make the artists nervous. I'm still surprised we got the interior artists on board, but that's because we took a strong stand for the attribution which is a major problem for all kinds of artists, including Wikipedian photographers. We also conceded museums and galleries to the artists, just for the psychological comfort.

r

On 1 Jun 2016 17:26, "John Hendrik Weitzmann" <john.weitzmann@wikimedia.de> wrote:
Hi Raul,

no opening discussion there yet. The time for it in Germany would be after (and if) the EU FoP harmonisation calls for opening the issue nationally. In practice the limitation on "from public grouds, ground level" has not lead to too much uncertainty IIRC, the Hundertwasserhaus case being an exception. That said, private drones becoming ever more popular definitely will open this discussion again. So maybe we should focus on things like interior of public buildings, which are also not covered under FoP in Germany.

Greetz
John

2016-06-01 14:20 GMT+02:00 Raul Veede <raul.veede@gmail.com>:
Hi.

Has there been any discussion about possibly (re)opening the question of the clause limiting FoP that demands that the pictures should be taken _from_ a public place? It could be argued this creates complications for businesses (as clearly demonstrated by the Hundertwasser case) and has potential for unlimited amount of uncertainty (the place where the photographer stood usually remains unseen on the picture itself, so the legality is hard to determine afterwords, especially on the Internet, e.g. on Commons). Most jurisdictions with FoP can get very well by without such a clause, and it is hard to see what benefit it creates for the public, or actually even for any private rightsholders.

Best,

Raul,
working on FoP in Estonia

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:57 PM, John Hendrik Weitzmann <john.weitzmann@wikimedia.de> wrote:
Hi all,

@Jens: Thx for the warm welcome. The settling in is not quite done yet. I'm still watching/learning and trying to tend to urgent things on the way. The justice ministry is high on the meeting agenda, a direct contact to the head of their copyright unit exists. Their ideas and initiatives around exceptions & limitations definitely touch on Wikiprojects. Any concrete suggestions welcome. Main items on this year's WMDE work plan regarding lawmaking are public works, freedom of panorama, database directive and ancillary publichers right, the three last of which happen mainly on the EU level as yet.

Best
John
 

2016-06-01 8:01 GMT+02:00 Mathias Schindler <mathias.schindler@gmail.com>:
Hi,

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Jens Best <best.jens@gmail.com> wrote:

> I heard that the German ministry of justice is reevaluating the
> "Schrankenregeln" (kind of the German version of fair use) as one aspect of
> this year's copyright laws reevaluation. Wouldn't that be a possible focus
> which relates to the volunteer work of the Wikiprojects?

a more precise translation of Schrankenregeln is "limitations and
exceptions" in copyright. EU member states can implement exceptions
listed in the InfoSoc Directive, they are not allowed to implement
exceptions not listed there. The current German government has
announced to adjust certain exceptions dealing with education. Other
than that, the introduction of a fair use clause in German copyright
would require some legislation on the EU level*

Mathias


* (Martin Senftleben is slightly more optimistic here
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1959554)

_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy



--
Referent für Politik und Recht
Legal and Policy Advisor

Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. +49 (0)30 219 158 26-0

Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch an der Menge allen Wissens frei teilhaben kann. Helfen Sie uns dabei!

Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207.

_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy



_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy




--
Referent für Politik und Recht
Legal and Policy Advisor

Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. +49 (0)30 219 158 26-0

Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch an der Menge allen Wissens frei teilhaben kann. Helfen Sie uns dabei!

Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207.

_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy