On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com> wrote:
In a third step we will need to think really hard about what to prioritise and what could be dropped from the list, since the most valuable resource is attention and focus. We can't go ahead with a 20 point list, at least not as part of a general policy statement.

I think the prioritization you guys have already done for your EU work makes sense as a starting point. I don't want to replicate or throw out that work. We'll inevitably have to adapt somewhat based on opportunity, but that's probably the right place to at least start the discussion.

Luis


--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810

NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.