24 June 2015 17:17hi micheal,
should we add a special use cases to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-06-17/In_focus
eg "can I upload my photos to facebook?" "no because according to
2.1..."
but in this specific case I assume that facebook/google/... has
collective agreements with all authors/architects associations.
michal24 June 2015 16:57The argument that personal Facebook uploads are 'non-commercial' does not hold water.
Any private individual who uploads personal photographs to a social media website will be affected, as most sites require users to warrant that their uploads do not not infringe the intellectual property rights of any third party. Anybody using social media to share even private photographs that include a modern building or streetscape within the view will be in breach of the warranty and will be at significant legal risk.
Also, many websites state in their small print that uploads are automatically licensed to the site owner under a worldwide non-exclusive licence for any purpose (even commercial). Uploaders will not be in a position to grant such a licence, as they will no longer be the sole copyright owner of their own photographs.
The relevant clauses in the Facebook legal terms can be found here: https://www.facebook.com/legal/terms
- 2.1 For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos (IP content), you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License).
- 5.1 You will not post content or take any action on Facebook that infringes or violates someone else's rights or otherwise violates the law.
Michael
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors24 June 2015 14:07He has to be convinced then that the commercial sharing is not as simple issue as it is believed by Svoboda.
https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Defining_Noncommercial Here. 18 MB of freading, cca 250 pages.
Jan
______________________________________________________________
> Od: Michal Palenik <michal@palenik.sk>
> Komu: Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com>
> Datum: 24.06.2015 14:51
> Předmět: Re: freedom of panorama
>i've contacted
ŠTEFANEC Ivan <ivan.stefanec@europarl.europa.eu>
with some mixed results.
he believes in press release by pavel svoboda
http://us9.campaign-archive2.com/?u=0519b32bd74df1cad7d02aa01&id=3d98dde117
which says that "of course, facebook photos are non commercial". which
i doubt.
but after a second email:
Každopádne je jasné, že presadzujem slobodu šírenia záberov okolia bez
obmedzenia a podľa toho budem aj hlasovať.
It is evident, that I acitvelly support
freedom of spreading of panorama photos without (any) restrictions and
I will vote according to this.
michal
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:04:39AM +0200, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov wrote:
> I was offering Schaake (ALDE NL) one and she said she's rwady to coordinate
> if no one else wants.
>
> Perhaps you can ask then to either join her effort or to take it up
> themselves. Will send you the AM text, but Schaake still hasn't tabled it.
>
> Dimi
>
> На сряда, 24 юни 2015 г. Michal Palenik <michal@palenik.sk> написа:
> > hi, is the amendment for the plenary ready? I am contacting our MEPs..
> >
> > m
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:01:58AM +0200, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov wrote:
> >> The amendment was adopted with a vast majority (EPP and S&D votes) by the
> >> JURI committee, so it is already in the text. We're now trying to get an
> >> amendment in for the plenary vote. This requires 75 MEPs to co-sign it.
> We
> >> need especially EPP ones to help it to send a message. If you could find
> >> some from SK, that would be awesome!
> >>
> >> As for a press release, the EN signpost article is very comprehensive:
> >>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-06-17/In_focus
> >>
> >> 2015-06-19 9:27 GMT+02:00 Michal Palenik <michal@palenik.sk>:
> >>
> >> > ok,
> >> >
> >> > just to clarify:
> >> > it is "just" a yet unvoted on ammendmend by a MEP?
> >> >
> >> > is there a good press release? i would not want it to by "yet another
> >> > stupid thing done by brussels bureocracy".
> >> >
> >> > michal
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:26:38PM +0200, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov
> wrote:
> >> > > Yes, I forgot to cc you in the main talk and you're probably not on
> the
> >> > > advocacy advisors mailing list. We need three things:
> >> > >
> >> > > -Media noise in each member state
> >> > > -MEPs from each country to co-sign an amendment proposal from plenary
> >> > > -Find coalition partners that can help us do the first two.
> >> > >
> >> > > I am putting Jan Louzek from WMCZ in cc. He's done an outstanding job
> >> > there
> >> > > to make noise and hopefully can help give WMSK some tips how we can
> do
> >> > the
> >> > > same in SK.
> >> > >
> >> > > Dimi
> >> > >
> >> > > 2015-06-18 23:20 GMT+02:00 Michal Palenik <michal@palenik.sk>:
> >> > >
> >> > > > hi
> >> > > >
> >> > > > there is a big big talk about freedom of panorama ban by european
> >> > > > parliament. are there any things we can do to avoid it? or is it
> just
> >> > > > panicing?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ammendemt 421 by jean marie cavada
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FNONSGML%20COMPARL%20PE-549.469%2001%20DOC%20PDF%20V0%2F%2FEN
> >> > > >
> >> > > > michal
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > michal palenik
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > michal palenik
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> > --
> > michal palenik
> >
> >
--
michal palenik
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors