I can think of a few cases and issues to consider here:
 
Hope these help with some ideas.  None (except Hargreaves) are especially long. 
 
FT2.
 


 
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all,

Yesterday the commission published the long expected press release (attached) announcing the launch of stakeholder dialogue to reform copyright legislation.

(SNIP)

 
 
COPY OF LIST EMAIL FROM 11 NOV 2012 FOR INFO
 

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Stephen LaPorte <slaporte@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hello all,

On Friday, the Republican Study Committee released a policy brief on "Three Myths about Copyright Law and Where to Start to Fix it". The paper discusses four potential policy solutions: (1) reform statutory damages; (2) expand fair use; (3) punish false copyright claims; and, (4) limit copyright terms and have heavy disincentives for renewal.

A copy of the report is attached, and "Infringement Nation" (Tehranian 2007) is available here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1029151

On Saturday, the executive director of the RSC sent out a letter withdrawing the brief:

From: Teller, Paul
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 04:11 PM
Subject: RSC Copyright PB

We at the RSC take pride in providing informative analysis of major policy issues and pending legislation that accounts for the range of perspectives held by RSC Members and within the conservative community. Yesterday you received a Policy Brief on copyright law that was published without adequate review within the RSC and failed to meet that standard. Copyright reform would have far-reaching impacts, so it is incredibly important that it be approached with all facts and viewpoints in hand. As the RSC’s Executive Director, I apologize and take full responsibility for this oversight. Enjoy the rest of your weekend and a meaningful Thanksgiving holiday....

Paul S. Teller
Executive Director
U.S. House Republican Study Committee
Paul.Teller@mail.house.gov
http://republicanstudycommittee.com

More coverage:

* http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/84018.html?hp=r5
* http://www.volokh.com/2012/11/16/republicans-repudiate-40-years-of-tougher-copyright-laws/
* http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/16481921080/house-republicans-copyright-law-destroys-markets-its-time-real-reform.shtml

Best,
Stephen

--

For legal reasons, I may only serve as an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation. This means I may not give legal advice to or serve as a lawyer for community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.


_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors