On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 6:55 PM, James Salsman <jsalsman@gmail.com> wrote:
Luis,

Thank you for your very thoughtful reply. I am far more interested in preventing our readers from investigation because of their whims of curiosity than in frustrating the NSA or alerting the community to surveillance.

I suppose that's what I eventually meant by "frustrate" the NSA; i.e., frustrate their purpose - sorry for the lack of clarity. Most likely, trying to game the system with something like this won't work - you really need to either press for new legislation or fight the request in the court system.
 
Are Foundation employees served as individuals allowed to talk to you about them? If so, are you allowed to talk with your colleagues in the legal department about the letters?

They're allowed to talk to their legal representatives; as employees, that's us. Realistically, in this sort of situation they'd probably go directly to Geoff; exactly how far he'd share with the rest of the team would probably depend on the circumstances. It's entirely possible he'd share only with outside counsel, but he might inform one or two other team members to manage the case as well.

Luis

Luis
 
Best regards,
James Salsman


On Sunday, August 4, 2013, Luis Villa wrote:

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:37 PM, James Salsman <jsalsman@gmail.com> wrote:

Luis,

Would it be legal to adopt a policy that any individual served with a National Security Letter must immediately request a transfer to a department headed by a different C-level officer?

If so, is the Foundation willing to adopt such a policy?

Hi, James-

It's not clear to me what the purpose of such a policy would be. I can think of two possible goals, neither of which really work.

If the goal is "frustrate the purpose of the NSL by depriving the recipient of the authority to respond to the NSL", then the FBI simply continues to send NSLs to whoever we hire as a replacement, until we have no one left in ops. At that point, they start working their way up the chain and we're left with (1) a crippled organization and (2) eventually a letter to the ED, who is legally compelled to make the thing happen anyway. Or, if the policy is public, they just start with the ED.

If the goal is "alert the community that NSLs are being sent" (or if that alerting happens accidentally, as a result of public knowledge of the policy, + goal #1) then that's probably a violation of the relevant law, which allows disclosure only to "those to whom such disclosure is necessary to comply with the request or an attorney to obtain legal advice or legal assistance with respect to the request" (18 USC 2709(c)(1), http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2709).

Note that the statute was updated a few years back to make it quite clear that you're allowed to talk to your lawyer about these when you get them, recent disclosed letters appear to refer clearly to that permission, and if our legal department got one, we'd be eager to fight. (That said, it does probably make sense to remind our employers that if they get an NSL, they are clearly entitled to speak to LCA; we'll look into how best to do that.)

Luis

 
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors




--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810

NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.

_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors




--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810

NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.