Hello Dimi and Bea,I agree, this is great start for a conversation. I posted the list to a talk page on Meta, so we can keep track of your suggestions: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:AdvocacyFeel free to add to the list, discuss, or re-organize.Stephen--On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Beatriz Busaniche <bea@vialibre.org.ar> wrote:
El 23/10/13 12:36, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov escribió:
> *Fundamental goals:*
> Shorten (or prevent extension) of copyright termsGreat Summary!!
> Raising treshhold for required added creativity
> Standardised limitations and exceptions
> Opt-in copyright system (like patent law)
I'd rather say: Fundamental goal:
* Strengthen the public domain.
For that we need:
And I would like to add something related to Orphan works. Opt-in
> Shorten (or prevent extension) of copyright terms
> Raising treshhold for required added creativity
> Standardised limitations and exceptions
> Opt-in copyright system (like patent law)
system if good for that, but we also need a clear policy for them.
Regards,
Bea
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
Stephen LaPorteLegal CounselWikimedia FoundationFor legal reasons, I may only serve as an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation. This means I may not give legal advice to or serve as a lawyer for community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors