Hi James,

Thank you for raising this point. If we see strong community consensus to take action against the TPP, we'll look into the best avenue for the Foundation to get involved in the debate.

Thanks,
Stephen

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:48 PM, James Salsman <jsalsman@gmail.com> wrote:
Charles,

The work on mass digitization is very important. Thank you.

Given https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/10/final-leaked-tpp-text-all-we-feared
does the Foundation have a plan to oppose the TPP in the Senate?

Can you tell me why my requests to oppose the TPP by joining other organizations' efforts were not acted on, please?

Do you agree that public policy advocacy actions should be evaluated by and weighted by the extent to which they support the Foundation's mission in proportion to utilitarian measures of community support?


On Friday, October 9, 2015, Charles M. Roslof <croslof@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Hi all,


Earlier this year, the U.S. Copyright Office proposed a pilot program for extended collective licensing of mass digitization projects. Today, we submitted our comments to the Office. We criticized the pilot program for its misguided conception of mass digitization and the limitations it proposed for digital collections. We think these faults make the pilot program bad for free knowledge, and we urge the Copyright Office not to implement it as it is currently proposed.


You can read more about the comments in this blog post:

https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/10/09/access-mass-digitization/


You can read the comments here:

https://policy.wikimedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/WMF-Mass-Digitization-Comments.pdf


And you can help spread the message by following @wikimediapolicy on Twitter and retweeting us:

https://twitter.com/wikimediapolicy/status/652609998573297664


Thanks,

Yana & Chuck

==
Charles M. Roslof
Intellectual Property & Internet Law Fellow
Wikimedia Foundation

NOTICE: This message might contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you have received this message by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. For legal reasons, I may only serve as a legal fellow for the Wikimedia Foundation. This means I may not give legal advice to or serve as a lawyer for community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer.

_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy




--
Stephen LaPorte
Legal Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation

NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal and ethical reasons, I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer.