On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Dave Steer <daves@mozillafoundation.org> wrote:
--DaveExperience so far backs up everything that Bekka pointed out. Again, we're in the early stages (please join the conversation!) and happy to report out on what we're learning along the way.We're also organizing by issue area. Our hypothesis is that email distribution lists are good, but threaded online discussions can be additive with more ongoing, nuanced discussions and organizing.I'd be happy to answer any questions about our experience with Discourse. We're just getting started with the platform, so we are experimenting with different types of conversation to see what helps the policy & advocacy community the most.Hi all -I recently joined the list. Since it's my first time emailing, I wanted to introduce myself -- I'm Dave Steer. I work on Policy & Advocacy at Mozilla.
Our initial idea is to use Discourse in two ways: first, for people who applied to the Ford-Mozilla Open Web Fellows program to engage with NGOs on specific job and volunteer opportunities. We saw so many qualified people with tech skills that want to participate in policy during the application process and, with Discourse, we want to keep them engaged especially as many NGOs are looking for people with engineering backgrounds to advance their campaigns.
_________
Dave Steer
Director, Advocacy
Mozilla Foundation
Email: davesteer@mozillafoundation.org
Cell: 415-845-5110
Twitter: @davesteer and @MozillaAdvocacy
www.mozilla.org/advocacyOn Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Rebecca Kahn <bekka@p2pu.org> wrote:Hi AllWe've been using Discourse for a while at P2PU, in various deployments ( discussion space for online courses, as a replacement for mailing lists) and have found several things:
- It's kind of like the Linux of community management. It takes some work to install and set up properly, and needs a degree of ongoing gardening-care.
- It is a slow-burn community building tool because there is quite a high bar to entry and initial engagement (you have to earn a degree of trust permissions in order to participate)
- On the plus side (and this is a big plus) it's great at filtering out bad stuff.
- However, it's also hard to surface good stuff.
- Overall, it's fantastic for smaller, highly engaged conversations, and it actively discourages shallow, large scale conversations
If anyone has any more questions about Discourse as a community management tool, let me know, I'm busy writing a report on our deployment of it for a P2PU / Mozilla OER project and am happy to try and answer any questions...BekkaOn 22 April 2015 at 09:53, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com> wrote:Dimi@LuisI would be happy to try this platform and perhaps this group can be one of the first use cases. The current issue I see with this mailing list is that is makes it very hard for newcomers to catch up. The issue I have with Meta is that it doesn't really appeal to non-wiki/non-techie crowds.2015-04-21 17:37 GMT+02:00 Luis Villa <lvilla@wikimedia.org>:I'm curious to hear what people think of the use of Discourse (http://www.discourse.org/) in this use case; I've been keeping an eye on that project for a long time and think it might be interesting for some of our discussion forums once their support for email <-> forum bridges matures.LuisOn Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Yana Welinder <yana@wikimedia.org> wrote:+1. We've also chatted with their policy team in San Francisco a little bit and they have interesting initiatives in the pipeline. They recently launched an online discussion space for internet policy that you may want to check out: https://discourse.mozilla-advocacy.orgThanks,YanaOn Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Stevie Benton <stevie.benton@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:Hi Dimi,This is excellent news. I've done some work with Gervase in the past, including recently in some copyright workshops with Open Rights Group. He's really smart and I think he will be an excellent ally.Thank you,
StevieOn 21 April 2015 at 14:21, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________DimiCheers,I personally am excited that we'll have another advocate for free&open things on the ground here.We're also likely to experience similar organisational challenges, as they're also looking into a way to ensure a coherent message and strategy and involve their volunteer community.Their policy goals will be published soon and are centred around "not breaking the internet" and copyright, with a focus on goals such as having an "open norm" (i.e. fair use), an audiovisual citation exception and fighting against linking liability.Hello, everybody!Me and Karl just had a meeting with Mozilla's Jochai (San Francisco based) and Gervase (UK based and on this list). Mozilla will very quickly get active in Brussels hiring a full-time representative.
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors--Stevie Benton Head of External Relations Wikimedia UK +44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173 @StevieBentonWikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors--Yana WelinderSenior Legal Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6867@yanatweets
NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake.As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. In other words, IANYL. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer.
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors--Luis Villa
Sr. Director of Community Engagement
Wikimedia FoundationWorking towards a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
--_________
Dave Steer
Director, Advocacy
Mozilla Foundation
Email: davesteer@mozillafoundation.org
Cell: 415-845-5110
Twitter: @davesteer and @MozillaAdvocacy
www.mozilla.org/advocacy