Hi Luis,
I like your new document, but I have a question.
Do you prefer "Relate very clearly to interests of Wikimedians" or
"Relate very clearly to interests of our readers"?
Best regards,
James Salsman
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Luis Villa <lvilla(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi, all-
Since SOPA, we've seen a steady trickle of advocacy groups approaching us
and asking us to banner or shut down for a variety of causes/events/etc. Not
surprisingly, they usually come away frustrated.[1]
I think that a lot of the frustration stems from two sources:
- misunderstanding who we are/what we do
- confusion about how best to ask us when there is a legitimate problem.
To help address those points, I've put together a super, super-preliminary
draft that we can point people at when they ask us to do advocacy for them,
telling them better what to expect, how to help themselves, etc. It is here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Asking_Wikimedians_To_Support_Advocacy
Please feel free to edit/hack at it/tell me it is awful :)
Luis
[1] Recent example:
https://thedaywefightback.org/letter-to-wikipedia/
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have
received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake.
As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I
cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members,
volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors