Hello,
I have given a quick look to the bill. It's difficult to draw definite conclusions : the signification of the text greatly depends on the present state of several fields of Philippine legislation (on libel for instance).
I have nevertheless some concerns about the c1 paragraph of the fourth section defining the crime of cybersex : « The willful engagement, maintenance, control, or operation, directly or indirectly, of any lascivious exhibition of sexual organs or sexual activity, with the aid of a computer system, for favor or consideration. » I may be wrong, but the enforcement of this paragraph could potentially prevent the diffusion of explicit encyclopedic photographies and illustrations on sexual topics.
Pierre-Carl Langlais aka Alexander Doria
Hi Roman,
I really appreciate your sharing this with us. Is it possible you could give a brief summary to give us a gist of your concerns about the bill? Fully understand if you may be to busy to do that.
Thanks,
Geoff
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Roman Bustria Jr.
<bustrias@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello again.
Here is a clearer version.
Butch
WMPH
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Roman Bustria Jr.
<bustrias@gmail.com> wrote:
My Fellow Wikimedians,
We would like to ask your feedback on the new law signed by our President about Cybercrime whether it had a chilling effect on our local Wikipedia editors.
Official text is available on this link:
Thank you.
Roman "Butch" Bustria Jr.
Vice President
Wikimedia Philippines
The future of technology is defined by change, but the destiny of an organization is defined by commitment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is privileged and intended only for the recipients named. If the reader is not a representative of the intended recipient, any review, dissemination or copying of this message or the information it contains is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender, and delete the original message and attachments.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Is there a reason to ask about this on the internal mailing list? You
can get useful feedback from the open list, too.
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
--
--
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
--
Geoff Brigham
General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
149 New Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
+1 (415) 839-6885 ext. 6750
gbrigham@wikimedia.org
California Registered In-House Counsel
This message might have confidential or legally privileged information in it. If you have received this message by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. For legal reasons, I may only serve as an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation. This means I may not give legal advice to or serve as a lawyer for community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors