Hello everyone,
As many of you are aware, the new European copyright directive is is coming up for an important vote next week, and it includes a provision (Article 13) which would require websites which host large quantities of user uploaded content to run new content through upload filters to identify and block copyright infringing material.
Last year, we wrote about why Article 13 is bad for collaboration and freedom of expression online, and yesterday we published a
follow-up blog with Anna Mazgal of Wikimedia Deutschland addressing Article 13 and other troubling proposals for mandatory automatic content detection.
While technology like machine learning can be helpful in content evaluation (for example
ORES, which flags vandalism and rates article quality on Wikipedia), Wikimedia only uses these technologies to aid our community-driven processes. The community processes are particularly effective for catching copyright violations, and as a result the Wikimedia Foundation receives a small number of DMCA takedown notices every year, and
only a handful of these are granted.
We oppose Article 13 because we believe that policymakers need to leave room for community processes and protect user rights.
Many European chapters of the Wikimedia movement also participated in a Day of Action on June 12 against the proposal, writing blogs and tweeting under the hashtag #SaveYourInternet, so please amplify those as well.
Thanks,
Allison DavenportTechnology Law and Policy Fellow, Wikimedia Foundation