Hi Dimi,
There is now "strawman argument" and even more no "ad-hominem attack" from my side. Please stop these allegations.
There was in fact a person of the board of the foundation giving us a rare insight on what the foundation really thinks:
"We are a human right, Wikipedia is a human right - therefore we do not have to stick to stupid rules made up for this so-called open web."
and
"If these net neutrality thing is against Us, the Bringer of the Holy Human Right named Wikipedia, than these net neutrality people are on the wrong side - on the side which stands against human rights."
Well, if you ask me, and obviously many others, "assuming good faith" becomes pretty stupid, when spit in the face like this.
So if "productive and friendly" means don't mention the clear bullsh** said publicly by a representative of the foundation, there will be no "productive and friendly" bowing to this sick attitude which covers up ignorance with pseudo-debates while doing anyway what they want.
Net neutrality is bigger than Wikipedia. As long as Wikimedia is ignoring this simple fact and continuing selling Wikipedia Zero to providers around the world there can be no honest debate which even has a whiff of credibility.
So back to the preconditions of a decent debate: Apology for the insult happened at Wikimania & Stopping all efforts pushing WP0 as long there is no decision reached in this very very sensible global matter.
best regards
Jens