as expected: first ignoring the rules, then slashing people with other opinions. typical.
If somebody starts arguing the "human rights" are on the side of their own brand marketing it's time to realizes that dialogue is senseless.
Wikipedia Zero is NOT standing for free access to knowledge - it stands for free access to Wikimedia products. Wikipedia Zero isn't about "freeing the knowledge of the world to the people of the world", it is about "freeing the use of Wikipedia to the people of the world". Nice idea, but not possible if you give any thoughts to net neutrality.
Same as Facebook Zero is not about "bringing the internet to the people of the world" but bringing "Facebook to the people of the world." It's about brand dominion, not about enlightenment and human rights.
And Wikipedia Zero is a marketing tool for access providers. Human right? Free access to information? Maybe that's what some people dream this is about, but the reality is different.
over and out
Jens