*Hey everybody,If you are an editor of the French, Italian or English Wikipedia interested to contribute in building technologies for improving missing citation detection in Wikipedia articles, please read on.As part of our current work on verifiability https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Integrity, the Wikimedia Foundation’s Research team http://research.wikimedia.org is studying ways to use machine learning to flag unsourced statements needing a citation https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Identification_of_Unsourced_Statements. If successful, this project will allow us to identify areas where identifying high quality citations is particularly urgent or important.To help with this project, we need to collect high-quality labeled data regarding individual sentences: whether they need citations, and why. We created a tool for this purpose and we would like to invite you to participate in a pilot https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Identification_of_Unsourced_Statements/Citation_Reason_Pilot. The annotation task should be fun, short, and straightforward for experienced Wikipedia editors.If you are interested in participating, please proceed as follows: - Sign-up by (optionally) adding your name in the sign-up page https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Identification_of_Unsourced_Statements/Citation_Reason_Pilot/Sign_Up.- Go to http://labels.wmflabs.org/ui/enwiki/ http://labels.wmflabs.org/ui/enwiki/, login, and from 'Labeling Unsourced Statements’, request one (or more) workset. Each workset takes maximum 5 minutes to complete and contains 5 tasks. There is no minimum number of worksets, but of course the more labels you provide, the better.- For each task in a workset, the tool will show you an unsourced sentence in an article and ask you to annotate it. You can then label the sentence as needing an inline citation or not, and specify a reason for your choices. - If you can't respond, please select 'skip'. If you can respond but you are not 100% sure about your choice, please select 'Unsure'.If you have any question/comment, please let us know by sending an email to miriam@wikimedia.org miriam@wikimedia.org or leaving a message on the talk page of the project https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Identification_of_Unsourced_Statements/Citation_Reason_Pilot. We canrelatively easily adapt the tool if something needs to be changed.Thank you for your time!Miriam and Dario*
Hi Miriam and Dario
I became aware of your project during a recent discussion with the Petr Knoth from the CORE OA aggregatorhttps://core.ac.uk/ around how the CORE recommender might be leveraged to generate potential citations for Wikipedia articles.
I linked to your wiki towards the end of this blogpost: The wisdom of the crowd? Crowdsourcing for information professionalshttps://leedsunilibrary.wordpress.com/2018/04/19/the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-crowdsourcing-for-information-professionals/
Thanks
Nick
From: OpenAccess [mailto:openaccess-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Dario Taraborelli Sent: 23 April 2018 12:04 To: wikicite-discuss wikicite-discuss@wikimedia.org; wikipedia-library@lists.wikimedia.org; Open Access discussions openaccess@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [OpenAccess] Participate in a labeling campaign to identify unsourced statements in need of citations
Hey everybody,
If you are an editor of the French, Italian or English Wikipedia interested to contribute in building technologies for improving missing citation detection in Wikipedia articles, please read on.
As part of our current work on verifiabilityhttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Integrity, the Wikimedia Foundation’s Research teamhttp://research.wikimedia.org is studying ways to use machine learning to flag unsourced statements needing a citationhttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Identification_of_Unsourced_Statements. If successful, this project will allow us to identify areas where identifying high quality citations is particularly urgent or important.
To help with this project, we need to collect high-quality labeled data regarding individual sentences: whether they need citations, and why.
We created a tool for this purpose and we would like to invite you to participate in a pilothttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Identification_of_Unsourced_Statements/Citation_Reason_Pilot. The annotation task should be fun, short, and straightforward for experienced Wikipedia editors.
If you are interested in participating, please proceed as follows:
· Sign-up by (optionally) adding your name in the sign-up pagehttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Identification_of_Unsourced_Statements/Citation_Reason_Pilot/Sign_Up.
· Go to http://labels.wmflabs.org/ui/enwiki/, login, and from 'Labeling Unsourced Statements’, request one (or more) workset. Each workset takes maximum 5 minutes to complete and contains 5 tasks. There is no minimum number of worksets, but of course the more labels you provide, the better.
· For each task in a workset, the tool will show you an unsourced sentence in an article and ask you to annotate it. You can then label the sentence as needing an inline citation or not, and specify a reason for your choices.
· If you can't respond, please select 'skip'. If you can respond but you are not 100% sure about your choice, please select 'Unsure'.
If you have any question/comment, please let us know by sending an email to miriam@wikimedia.orgmailto:miriam@wikimedia.org or leaving a message on the talk page of the projecthttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Identification_of_Unsourced_Statements/Citation_Reason_Pilot. We can
relatively easily adapt the tool if something needs to be changed.
Thank you for your time!
Miriam and Dario
Hi Dario,
just to let you know that *finally* I got a couple of minutes to announce this at the Italian Village Pump: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bar/Discussioni/Aiutiamo_la_ricerca_...
Cheers,
L.
2018-04-23 13:03 GMT+02:00 Dario Taraborelli dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org:
Hey everybody,
If you are an editor of the French, Italian or English Wikipedia interested to contribute in building technologies for improving missing citation detection in Wikipedia articles, please read on.
As part of our current work on verifiability, the Wikimedia Foundation’s Research team is studying ways to use machine learning to flag unsourced statements needing a citation. If successful, this project will allow us to identify areas where identifying high quality citations is particularly urgent or important.
To help with this project, we need to collect high-quality labeled data regarding individual sentences: whether they need citations, and why.
We created a tool for this purpose and we would like to invite you to participate in a pilot. The annotation task should be fun, short, and straightforward for experienced Wikipedia editors.
If you are interested in participating, please proceed as follows:
Sign-up by (optionally) adding your name in the sign-up page.
Go to http://labels.wmflabs.org/ui/enwiki/, login, and from 'Labeling Unsourced Statements’, request one (or more) workset. Each workset takes maximum 5 minutes to complete and contains 5 tasks. There is no minimum number of worksets, but of course the more labels you provide, the better.
For each task in a workset, the tool will show you an unsourced sentence in an article and ask you to annotate it. You can then label the sentence as needing an inline citation or not, and specify a reason for your choices.
If you can't respond, please select 'skip'. If you can respond but you are not 100% sure about your choice, please select 'Unsure'.
If you have any question/comment, please let us know by sending an email to miriam@wikimedia.org or leaving a message on the talk page of the project. We can
relatively easily adapt the tool if something needs to be changed.
Thank you for your time!
Miriam and Dario
-- Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiCite Twitter: https://twitter.com/wikicite
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "wikicite-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wikicite-discuss+unsubscribe@wikimedia.org.
openaccess@lists.wikimedia.org