Hi,
"Who's against open access ?"
I'd say a not so naive answer would be
"None that can claim so."
What is the influence of wikipedia's journal article infobox in the popular (and researchers, and funders, and editors, and publishers) mindsets ?
Would an editor be reluctant to see his or her name associated with a "paywalled, lucrative, not archiving friendly, poorly-reviewed, journal" ?
I proposed updating wikipedian templates to fulfil wikipedian goal of making knowledge more accessible, stressing out key characteristics for journals.
Please contribute in this orientation with editions of related templates and infoboxes.
BR
Rudy
RP87