Well, the two WMF Board liaisons to the committee have suggested that the Board not ratify it.  WMDE and Wikimedia CEE have said they would vote for it. Others (like JMabel's thoughts I posted in the other thread) have also shared their takes.

In general many concerns raised on this list a month ago have not been addressed: the charter has inconsistencies and gaps, but makes it very hard to amend itself. It mandates that the new Council do four difficult things all at once, including developing a new movement-wide strategy.  It does not talk about how these tasks relate to existing movement bodies (like chapters and Projects that maintain their own priorities, 2030 goals, or annual plans). It has not addressed input from unaffiliated editors, many of whom said the current framework over privileges the views and needs of affiliates.  So I understand why the WMF liaisons keep expressing concern and suggested starting by transitioning a few specific functions.

I also understand why those who have felt held back by stagnating funding and inconsistent communications with the WMF might feel this is their only chance to have more say over evolution of collective priorities. And fear that if this vote doesn't pass right this instant, there might not be another such opportunity.

I would like to hear what you & others think.

SJ

🌍🌏🌎🌑