On Mar 28, 2014 2:12 PM, "Prateek Saxena" <psaxena@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:36 PM, bawolff <bawolff+wn@gmail.com> wrote:
> > How long would depend on the image. For example really big images take
> > slightly longer. But 1-2 seconds sound rightish to me. Firebug should be
> > able to give you how long it takes the image to load.
>
> I have never experienced this issue myself. Is there a list of images
> that haven't been converted to thumbnails yet. I could create test
> pages that link to it and measure performance on developer tools.
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:36 PM, bawolff <bawolff+wn@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Once lots of people use your tool the issue should go away due to varnish
> > and swift caching of thumbs.
>
> That is very reassuring. Could you please leave this as a comment to the bug?
>
>
> --prtksxna

Oh i didnt realize the delay was 15 seconds, thats an insane amount of time for most (maybe some obscure types in edge cases might take that).

I suspect something else is going on.

-bawolff