On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Brian Wolff <bawolff(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I was more thinking, we might want to take a moment to
future of thumbnail naming before adding lots of complexity to how we
specify thumbnail options. I've heard some people complain about our
thumbnail option naming system
There is some discussion ongoing about that in T66214
<https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T66214>. But IMO that's orthogonal.
Adding a bunch of new options wouldn't make the switch to a new format
significantly harder. At worst, it would mean the person who is adding the
options would have to do it twice.
(If you mean that improving thumbnail handling is a better place to focus
energies on right now, I agree, but as you said volunteers are free to do
whatever they want.)