Thanks, Bawolff.

From an end-user perspective, I like the idea of making the tag part of the file embedding syntax, as you propose (e.g.: [[file:foo.png|thumb|no-viewer|…]]).

I defer to our development team on how much more work that would entail. We now only have a few hours per week allocated to Media Viewer feature development, so we’re leaning towards the most expedient solutions right now.

Even if we start with just a class name right now (e.g. '.no-viewer'), that name that could eventually be re-used when we have time to make it part of the file embedding syntax, for consistency purposes.

BTW, I like ’no-viewer’ because it’s short and very explicit — and even if it’s loosely tied to the Media Viewer, it seems open-ended enough to be used by other apps in the future.

-f


On May 12, 2014, at 2:54 PM, bawolff <bawolff+wn@gmail.com> wrote:


On May 12, 2014 4:32 PM, "Fabrice Florin" <fflorin@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We would appreciate your help to come up with a class name that community members can use to exclude an image from Media Viewer or related tools. 
>
> Too many small files (like icons, flags, etc.) appear in Media Viewer for some articles, even though they are unrelated to the topic of the article. Other image files also need to be excluded, because they are not suitable for Media Viewer (such as maps using weird CSS/JS tricks, or images which use a clipping template).   
>
> Many community members have reported this issue, which delivers an unpleasant browsing experience for users who only want to view images that are relevant for the article they are reading (and which are supported by Media Viewer).
>
> We agree that this is an important issue. The most practical way to address it would require editors to add a .metadata class to the images they don’t want to show on a page, as proposed here: 
>
> https://wikimedia.mingle.thoughtworks.com/projects/multimedia/cards/511
>
> We just need to come up with a class name people are happy with for excluding an image from Media Viewer or related tools. We already exclude images which have a .metadata class, but there are images that aren't really metadata but still not appropriate.
>
> Any ideas? What class name do you recommend we use to convey this important information?
>
> Here are some possible ideas, to get this conversation started;
> * hide
> * exclude
> * noshow
> * ??
>
> It would be best if we agreed on a name that is not tied to Media Viewer, so it can be used by other tools which may have the same needs, now or in the future.
>
> Once we settle on a class name, we can schedule that feature for development, so editors can filter out unsuitable images for everyone’s viewing pleasure :)
>
> Thanks for your feedback!
>
>
> Fabrice
>
> _______________________________
>
> Fabrice Florin
> Product Manager, Multimedia
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fabrice_Florin_(WMF)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Multimedia mailing list
> Multimedia@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia
>

Probably much harder to implement... but it might be more consistent to have it as part of the file embedding syntax. E.g. [[file:foo.png|thumb|no-viewer|...]]

--bawolff

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

_______________________________

Fabrice Florin
Product Manager
Wikimedia Foundation