Hey Bence

I am still around. ;)

But I think the pages you listed require much wider discussion than this group, if it exists anymore. Most of your pages are on Meta, so I think forwarding to Internal should not be an issue? 

I see a lot there that needs to be fleshed out.

Regards
Theo

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Bence Damokos <bdamokos@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,

I am not sure if this list is still active, but I thought if there is anyone left, they might be interested to help out.

Currently, the Chapters/Affiliations Committee is considering the procedural elements needed for processing applications for the new types of affiliates, the actual substance of the process largely depend on the requirements and definition we use. 

I would appreciate if you could take a look at a number of wiki pages I have started [based on the similar pages for chapters and the conclusions of this group] and provide feedback (which could range from "seems good" to suggestions and actual edits for changes). My aim is not to restart any debates that we have already concluded, rather to make sure that the documents created reflect the final consensus and nothing is left out and nothing controversial is added.


Thank you,
Best,
Bence

_______________________________________________
Movementroles mailing list
Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles