I've been thinking about this, and some of the issues are imho too detailed and formalized - I am not sure if we should pull it that far. I think it would be helpful to put this forward at the internal mailing list and see some responses there?
I do not think that the audit committee would be the right group to conduct this. I am very much in favor of a peers evaluation (as we discussed before) because that gives less stress, and more understanding. This should also make it look less hostile. This could be part of Chapcom New Style (if re-arranged into a two tier committee for example) or a totally new thing - that is secondary.
Best,
Lodewijk